tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3609683919099708226.comments2023-06-16T09:39:07.504-04:00Harpocrates SpeaksTodd W.http://www.blogger.com/profile/16192694127268195554noreply@blogger.comBlogger1508125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3609683919099708226.post-85242080642237062512017-10-01T09:21:14.648-04:002017-10-01T09:21:14.648-04:00injecting any of this stuff into muscle seems unph...injecting any of this stuff into muscle seems unphysiological to me. Talk about clogging the lymphatic system with Aluminum. <br />Aluminum is a coagulator or flocculant. Aluminum has a plus three electrical charge. All positive cations are “coagulators”, they cause particles with mass to come together, agglomerate, sediment, “sludge”. Aluminum has 84 times the capacity to cause agglomeration (sludging) as does Sodium (Na+), and element with a singular positive charge.<br /><br />We use aluminum in water treatment plants, to cause “sludging”, agglomeration, and flocculation so that impurities in water sediment to the bottom of the water. We use aluminum in anti-antiperspirants since they cause “sludging” and blockage of the perspiration ducts in the arm pits. This same sludging is achieved in human tissue and blood flow from vaccinations with aluminum. The ischemic tissue attracts macrophages that attempt to “clean up” the damaged tissue as well as the sedimented aluminum. This causes an inflammatory response (or not). The aluminum cannot readily be removed from the tissue since the large positive charge (from Aluminum) derails the negative electrostatic carrying capacity of the blood where the aluminum has accumulated. The blood vessels, muscle, and fascia in the tissue area will be damaged from the on-going ischemia and the inability to remove aluminum from the area (an electrical charge problem). The macrophages and white blood cells will be called to this area to “clean up.” It is the act of the immune system chronically coming to this tissue area that perpetuate the problem and creates greater disease and the possibility for induction of an autoimmune response, or immunological tolerance through anergy or deletion.<br />Detroit Remedyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02068584178356569060noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3609683919099708226.post-16504956489962604342017-08-27T21:34:39.770-04:002017-08-27T21:34:39.770-04:00Thank you for pointing that out. At the time that ...Thank you for pointing that out. At the time that I wrote this post in 2015, the source included the table that I copied above, listing HPV vaccine as having .225mg/dose (source: https://web.archive.org/web/20150207072840/http://vec.chop.edu/service/vaccine-education-center/vaccine-safety/vaccine-ingredients/aluminum.html).<br /><br />Gardasil lists .225mg aluminum hydroxyphosphate suflate per dose. (source: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/biologicsbloodvaccines/vaccines/approvedproducts/ucm111263.pdf)<br /><br />Cervarix lists .5mg aluminum hydroxide per dose. (source: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/biologicsbloodvaccines/vaccines/approvedproducts/ucm186981.pdf)<br /><br />I've updated the post to reflect the added information.Todd W.https://www.blogger.com/profile/16192694127268195554noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3609683919099708226.post-41037076844686531402017-08-27T20:32:30.454-04:002017-08-27T20:32:30.454-04:00your own source for HPV says .5mg rather than the ...your own source for HPV says .5mg rather than the .225 you listed, fyi.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10886252205744127599noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3609683919099708226.post-84619477688480661302017-07-16T16:01:19.229-04:002017-07-16T16:01:19.229-04:00Rima Laibow left the following comment. I'm no...Rima Laibow left the following comment. I'm not approving the original, because it contains a link to her own site. I've redacted the link, but included the title of her paper for those who wish to search for it.<br /><br />To Dr. Laibow, if you read this, your paper is a lot of opinion and conjecture rather than scientifically rigorous evidence, and, like many anti-vaccine folks, you seem particularly hung up on <i>death</i> rates prior to the introduction of vaccines, ignoring the incidence and non-fatal effects of preventable diseases. Similarly, you repeat many other claims that have no basis in reality.<br /><br />Finally, I'll address your off-topic comment specifically. I do not have a religious devotion to vaccines. I readily note where they are lacking and in need of improvement. I base my opinion of them on the abundant available evidence showing that, in general, they are better than nothing, in contrast with the logically deficient claims of the anti-vaccine crowd.<br /><br />Oh, and I never claimed to be a scientist. Perhaps you ought to work on your reading comprehension. It may help improve your analysis of the literature and revise your erroneous conclusions. <br /><br />If you wish to comment further, please ensure that your comment is on-topic with the post you're commenting on and does not read like spam attempting to direct traffic to your site. Thank you.<br /><br /><b>Dr. Laibow's Comment:</b><br />Well, actually, despite your passionate, one might say religious, devotion to the good of vaccination, the independent science does not bear out your faith. Nor do government statistics. Vaccines are highly unreliable and questionable as health adjuncts. Please take a look at [redacted link leads to Final-All-India-Medical-Congress-Paper.020415.pdf] <br />for some careful analysis of the relevant data.<br />Based on your article, I can predict that you will not like it, but based on your assertion that you are a scientist, that really does not matter.<br />Yours in health and freedom,<br />Dr. Rima<br />Rima E. Laibow, MD<br />Medical Director<br />Natural Solutions Foundation Todd W.https://www.blogger.com/profile/16192694127268195554noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3609683919099708226.post-69461476424597041042017-07-13T12:06:15.503-04:002017-07-13T12:06:15.503-04:00Citation needed showing that sanitation prevents m...Citation needed showing that sanitation prevents measles.Chrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14428361191787397415noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3609683919099708226.post-78407227770518254502017-07-12T09:40:27.793-04:002017-07-12T09:40:27.793-04:00Todd their isn't any studies done using all th...Todd their isn't any studies done using all these compounds found in vaccines and how the body reacts to all of them at once. Formaldehyde, Mercury, Aluminum, MSG, beta-propiolactone, fetal tissue, Polysorbate 80, antibiotics, and propylene glycol to mention some. I want to find the study where all of these are injected in an animal and at what level does it become toxic? Because we are injecting our own human babies without knowing the consequence. We only see one compound at a time being studied for their toxicity. That along with the multiple shots given at a time will add up. Our bodies function at a micro level. All of these compounds injected into a new developing baby may or may not alter developing biological pathways. We literally do not know what the outcome will be. And that should be scary enough to take a look at it. Yvette Isaishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03390539861634142699noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3609683919099708226.post-19089906230914454412017-07-12T09:39:36.523-04:002017-07-12T09:39:36.523-04:00Todd their isn't any studies done using all th...Todd their isn't any studies done using all these compounds found in vaccines and how the body reacts to all of them at once. Formaldehyde, Mercury, Aluminum, MSG, beta-propiolactone, fetal tissue, Polysorbate 80, antibiotics, and propylene glycol to mention some. I want to find the study where all of these are injected in an animal and at what level does it become toxic? Because we are injecting our own human babies without knowing the consequence. We only see one compound at a time being studied for their toxicity. That along with the multiple shots given at a time will add up. Our bodies function at a micro level. All of these compounds injected into a new developing baby may or may not alter developing biological pathways. We literally do not know what the outcome will be. And that should be scary enough to take a look at it. Yvette Isaishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03390539861634142699noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3609683919099708226.post-24980423298008462202017-07-11T15:35:19.792-04:002017-07-11T15:35:19.792-04:0070% of the immune system is in the bowels;homo sap...70% of the immune system is in the bowels;homo sapiens existence has been pushed back beyond the 10,000 years of recorded history by 100s of thousands of years (according to forensic archeologists), through all of which the human race relied upon and survived because of our immune systems. Easy guys, where's the anecdotal evidence of autistic Minoans, Phoenicians and Romans? Oh, yeah, no modern wonderful vaccines filled with garbage. No babies being saved from a disease transmitted solely through sex and used hypodermic needles, by injection (into a newborn child) supposed to "activate" an immune system that takes 7 years to fully develop. Wow. Like the annual flu vaccine made from 3 out of 300 known flu virus'. <br /><br />Clean water and living conditions have saved and improved more lives than all the vaccines ever given; but hey, you want to believe the people who (at one time) said smoking tobacco was safe and healthy, eggs were bad for you, x-rays safe enough to measure shoe sizes in stores, and that washing hands between patients was a waste of time. Sure they learned differently, after lots of people suffered and died. <br />Healthcare in this country needs to be returned to being service based instead of profit based; another gift from Nixon, to go with the War on Drugs. LolPadre of Lakelandhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12805610139435671543noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3609683919099708226.post-35803102680734303772017-06-23T11:40:05.349-04:002017-06-23T11:40:05.349-04:00The plural of anecdote is still not data. The Vac...The plural of anecdote is still not data. The Vaccine Information Sheets that federal law require to be given whenever a vaccine is given in the USA have the phone numbers and web addresses of how to submit stories of vaccine reactions to both VAERS and to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.<br /><br />If you did not receive a Vaccine Information Sheet before a vaccine, then you have a legitimate claim against the doctor. If you were given one and failed to actually read it, then you are the one to blame. Since you are commenting on a three year old article without identifying who it is addressed to, I would more likely believe the latter is true.Chrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14428361191787397415noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3609683919099708226.post-80079316778996594342017-06-09T08:20:18.424-04:002017-06-09T08:20:18.424-04:00All those case reports about mule-headed doctors t...All those case reports about mule-headed doctors that kept to the schedule despite contraindications or reactions written by the mule-headed doctors about their own mule-headedness? Do you only accept domestic violence allegations from victims who can present you with an admission of guilt by the perpetrator documented on a police statement? Who is to write these case reports may I ask? Not everyone is as lucky as you and has a diligent and knowledgeable doctor to work with. There are large clusters of these anecdotes on forums and websites who would love to have it documented in a case study. But they feel failed by the system and don't know where to turn. Their stories ARE scary. Science is great in general (well it's got a few problems if you're talking science industry), but you're a fool if you think it can provide evidence for all current events.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18278594930726716169noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3609683919099708226.post-44279616019093094712017-04-27T09:48:13.132-04:002017-04-27T09:48:13.132-04:00In my country, it is still popular to deliberately...In my country, it is still popular to deliberately get infected with chicken pox while you are young. Parents do that their kids. Chicken pox is considered harmless disease, less dangerous than flue.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07048585502008426076noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3609683919099708226.post-45237671764914093052017-04-27T09:06:56.707-04:002017-04-27T09:06:56.707-04:00Which evidence btw? How do you choose which claims...Which evidence btw? How do you choose which claims to believe in? Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07048585502008426076noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3609683919099708226.post-82860905940806517222017-04-27T09:00:23.164-04:002017-04-27T09:00:23.164-04:00This is a good article, but it doesn't end wel...This is a good article, but it doesn't end well. You ended up with a conclusion that has nothing to do with the article itself. You say its better to get a vaccine. How can I know which option is better without even considering the consequences of getting a vaccine. They are millions of cases of vaccines gone wrong resulting with serious illnesses, disabilities and deaths. So if we have scientific study of all the numbers about illness/deaths inflicted with measles vaccines and compare them to the numbers of illness/deaths inflicted with measles, we may be able to come to some kind of conclusion which is better. The thing is we (countries, governments, humanity) are scarce at keeping real records about vaccines and diseases. Many of the countries don't even record or archive such data.<br /><br />The reason why everybody is so skeptical is because the governments and the pharma industry will never tell us the truth. They'v been using Thimerosal for more than 80 years and all that time they claimed the vaccines are perfectly safe. Now its been proven that Mercury is powerful neurotoxin which cause all kinds of adverse reactions, diseases, cancer, autism, SIDS and what not. If a Mercury is spilt on the floor of a hospital they will evacuate the whole building, that's how poisonous Mercury is and we injected it in our bodies for half a century. <br /><br />Now that the Mercury has been replaced with some other conservant, are we to believe that this new chemical is safe? They use formaldehyde in 80% of the vaccines, this is also a poison. They use human fetus dna (monkey also) which many link to autoimmune diseases. In many cases there were outbreaks of diseases introduced with vaccines. <br /><br />The pharma industry has lobbied its way through court to pass immunity against any adverse effect. They'v been putting Mercury in our bodies for almost a century and they claimed vaccines are perfectly safe. They have never claimed responsibility for anything and all the parents and doctors who say that vaccines are dangerous are turned into pagans who don't believe in science. <br /><br />In 2011, India declared itself polio free country in the big news. Little it was told that in the same year 50.000 children were crippled with a polio virus from a vaccine. If 50.000 have been crippled 10 million have been infected. Nobody claimed responsibility. So how can you believe the pharma industry, again? The trillions of dollars they have can pay thousand studies that will 'show' how perfectly safe vaccines are. The pro vaccines studies are always written by respectable and successful doctors, while the anti vaccine speakers are always lunatics who have had their licences revoked. Can you see the pattern here?<br /><br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07048585502008426076noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3609683919099708226.post-63666715245084282012017-04-17T17:14:02.132-04:002017-04-17T17:14:02.132-04:00"Who is being dishonest?"
Ty Bollinger,..."Who is being dishonest?"<br /><br />Ty Bollinger, of course. It is all spelled out in this review of the first installment of that "documentary":<br />https://vaccinesworkblog.wordpress.com/2017/04/16/the-truth-about-vaccines-episode-1-top-ten-lies-debunked/Chrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14428361191787397415noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3609683919099708226.post-33604671201849626082017-04-13T12:57:22.007-04:002017-04-13T12:57:22.007-04:00I am sorry, but argument by video is not valid. W...I am sorry, but argument by video is not valid. What you can do is provide the PubMed indexed studies by reputable qualified researchers that any vaccine on the present American pediatric schedule causes <b>more</b> harm than the diseases.<br /><br />This means if you claim the MMR vaccine introduced in 1978 causes more harm than measles, then you need to provide that it causes encephalitis in one in a thousand doses and/or pneumonia in one if five doses. Chrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14428361191787397415noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3609683919099708226.post-48696876550828011672017-04-12T17:08:53.426-04:002017-04-12T17:08:53.426-04:00Who is being dishonest? The fact is most people as...Who is being dishonest? The fact is most people assume that vaccines are good for you and are not even aware that there are real risks and that vaccines haven't been thoroughly tested for safety. Doctors and parents are just suppose to take the vaccine developers word that they are safe. Really? Let's not continue to be so foolish. There are more scare tactics to vaccinate than the other way around. The decision is extremely difficult that's why you must search out the TRUTH for yourself. I suggest you watch the "The Truth About Vaccines Documentary" so you can make and informed decision.Elizabethhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02124814245507056219noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3609683919099708226.post-20609209828689704182017-04-11T16:47:24.148-04:002017-04-11T16:47:24.148-04:00My first question was very simple-how would the fa...My first question was very simple-how would the facts come out without a lawsuit?<br /><br />I will post later with a detailed and coherent breakdown of the issues but considering the blogger criticized the lawsuit filed by the parents there must be an alternative of which I am unaware.Lawgalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09448176770723717373noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3609683919099708226.post-83548782062496696372017-04-02T16:03:18.080-04:002017-04-02T16:03:18.080-04:00I'm guessing Avery is being facetious. There i...I'm guessing Avery is being facetious. There is a small amount of aluminum in most standard vaccines. Vaccines are likely safe, but there is risk with any medical intervention. It is all about whether, for your child, the benefit outweighs the potential risk.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07983066997907850445noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3609683919099708226.post-90647336719919842662017-04-02T15:59:57.809-04:002017-04-02T15:59:57.809-04:00I'm guessing Avery is being facetious. They a...I'm guessing Avery is being facetious. They are likely safe, but there is a small amount of aluminum in nearly all standard vaccines.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07983066997907850445noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3609683919099708226.post-87579902802316385562017-03-18T09:06:59.494-04:002017-03-18T09:06:59.494-04:00I haven't replied because I've been rather...I haven't replied because I've been rather busy, for starters, and second, any response would involve speculation. I think I've made it pretty clear that I'm not going to do that. We don't have enough of the facts. At this point, we're just going in circles.Todd W.https://www.blogger.com/profile/16192694127268195554noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3609683919099708226.post-40482968643113971562017-03-18T09:00:45.700-04:002017-03-18T09:00:45.700-04:00Hi, Six Million Dollar Gas Bill. Thanks for your c...Hi, Six Million Dollar Gas Bill. Thanks for your comment. Just some quick notes. I do apologize for the snarky "normal people". By that, I mean people not given to conspiracy theories; the vast majority of people who accept the reality that babies are born with blue eyes and that they typically change color over time as a natural process of melanocyte maturation. Also note that when someone has high exposure to mercury, it's not the iris that's changing color.<br /><br />The cool thing I find about hazel eyes is that they tend to change color depending on the lighting and colors worn by the person. Clothing and lighting can bring out the greys, greens, and browns to different degrees, so hazel eyes are very rarely the same <i>apparent</i> color from one day to the next. The amount of grey/green/brown can appear to change.<br /><br />Finally, with regard to comment moderation, perhaps you missed this from the text just above the comment form: "Comments on posts older than 30 days will go into moderation, due to the activities of commercial spammers." It's easy to overlook, but I just wanted to reassure you that I take a very light hand when it comes to comment moderation. And unfortunately, spammers trying to get people going to scam sites has resulted in my turning on moderation for older posts.Todd W.https://www.blogger.com/profile/16192694127268195554noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3609683919099708226.post-51950382203114398482017-03-18T03:35:12.888-04:002017-03-18T03:35:12.888-04:00And you need to "approve" my comment do ...And you need to "approve" my comment do you? Gatekeeping much??? Weak. That makes your article even less credible to me. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10700473522021235886noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3609683919099708226.post-28838458858255401872017-03-18T03:34:10.071-04:002017-03-18T03:34:10.071-04:00"Now, normal people understand that babies..."Now, normal people understand that babies' eyes change color as they age." "Normal" people??? Rather condescending tone. I have "autism," and when I started a protocol for heavy metal chelation, my hazel green eyes changed to grey hazel, and the rusty brown ring around the pupils began to fade. The only exposure to mercury I've had that I know of is the numerous thimerosal-laced vaccines I've had throughout my lifetime. The autistic traits are becoming less intense as I chelate as well. So... anecdotal as that is, it kind of throws a wrench in your retort that thimerosal likely has no effect on eye color.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10700473522021235886noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3609683919099708226.post-53058096383066827742017-03-18T03:29:32.998-04:002017-03-18T03:29:32.998-04:00"Now, normal people understand that babies..."Now, normal people understand that babies' eyes change color as they age." "Normal" people? Rather condescending tone. Anyway, I can count on one hand the number of autistic traits I don't have, and when I recently started a protocol of heavy metal chelation, my hazel green eyes changed to hazel grey, and the rusty brown ring around the pupil began to fade. This is after one month on the chelation protocol. The only exposure to mercury I've had that I know of is a number of thimerosal-laced vaccines.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10700473522021235886noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3609683919099708226.post-83228007654757901782017-02-28T23:35:16.650-05:002017-02-28T23:35:16.650-05:00As far as I know, diagnosis and treatment of psych...As far as I know, diagnosis and treatment of psychological disorders are defined in the DSM, in this case DSM-IV, which was current at the time this began. As I stated in my post of October 14, there were three criteria to be applied in the diagnosis of somatoform disorder. Two out of three were not met, in my opinion, yet the diagnosis was made in something like 24 hours. I have never seen any justification for the somatoform diagnosis based on the DSM-IV criteria on any forum, nor have I seen a rational justification of the permanent termination of parentap rights. I believe that here is a reluctance to oppose the state on questions of this type based on the perception that the state and any outside consultants it may employ are more "professional" and knowledgeable than anyone else, and therefore not to be questioned.DARhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11705086220230550975noreply@blogger.com