That sentiment, sympathizing with a child murderer, disgusted me then and disgusts me now. Part of the tragedy of this whole thing is that we only have Dorothy's voice being heard. HIPAA regulations block any revelations from the medical professionals being vilified by murder apologists at Age of Autism, Autism Media Channel and so on. Alex's voice has been permanently silenced. To make matters worse, CBS This Morning has decided to lend their support to Alex's killers.
In the segment, Alex is portrayed as a burden to his mother, aggressive, hard to manage. It is sadly an image that is all too common among media portrayals of autism, serving only to stigmatize individuals who already have a difficult enough time being understood and accepted by society. The viewer is left with the impression that Dorothy was driven to insanity (indeed, her lawyer goes on record that he will pursue an insanity defense) and is therefore innocent of brutally slaying her child.
Recall, if you will, that according to reports, Dorothy and Jolanta planned Alex's murder for at least a week. They first overdosed him with sleeping pills, and when that did not work, Dorothy took a knife from the kitchen, stabbed Alex several times in the chest, slashed his wrist so severely that she nearly severed his hand, then gave the knife to Jolanta, who killed the family cat so that it wouldn't be sent to a shelter. They then wiped the knife clean, placed it back in the kitchen, and took enough sleeping pills to render themselves unconscious, but no enough to commit the allegedly intended suicide. It was a premeditated and gruesome murder that cannot be excused.
The CBS report also parrots the myth that Dorothy did "not have a safety net". Yet as reported back in June, "a Department of Children and Family Services spokesperson says that Dorothy Spourdalakis was offered services, but she refused." According to the CBS video, we know that Dorothy was seeking fringe alternative (i.e., unsupported and unproven) biomed treatments supported by people like the discredited Andrew Wakefield (whose paper purporting to find gastrointestinal issues caused by MMR vaccine was retracted and found to contain fraudulent data) and Wakefield's former colleague from his days at Thoughtful House, Arthur Krigsman.
Dorothy had latched onto the belief that autism is just a medical condition. Cure the underlying medical problem (read: GI distress) and you cure the autism. She sought out Dr. Krigsman for that reason, hoping he would confirm her belief. Little surprise that Krigsman discovered exactly what she wanted him to find, and what he has already made a history of finding: purported GI abnormalities. In fact, his activities have landed him in hot water before.
One of his prior employers, Lenox Hill Hospital in New York, disciplined Dr. Krigsman for conducting research on pediatric patients without prior Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval. IRB approval helps to ensure that subjects' rights and welfare are protected. This is particularly important where vulnerable populations, such as children, are considered, and when the procedures involved (e.g. colonoscopies) carry greater than minimal risk. One of his proposals was rejected due to safety concerns that apparently were never corrected or addressed by Dr. Krigsman. In Texas, he represented himself as being able to see patients despite not yet being licensed in that state (see previous link), which brings to mind de-licensed physician Mark Geier and his son, David. Furthermore, according to Dr. Krigsman's participation in the Cedillo case in the Autism Omnibus Proceedings, he misrepresented himself on his C.V. Special Master Hastings' opinion also notes that Dr. Krigsman
seems highly inclined to diagnose the presence of gastrointestinal inflammation on the basis of almost any chronic GI symptoms. For example, he diagnosed Michelle [Cedillo] with “inflammatory bowel disease” in July of 2003, before he had even met and examined her.We have, therefore, an individual whose theory of autism causation is based on a retracted and fraudulent paper by Andrew Wakefield, who has a propensity to diagnose GI inflammation, conduct unwarranted and risky medical procedures, and conduct unethical research, among other problems, diagnosing Alex with GI inflammation.
A question I've heard regarding this is, why didn't Dr. Krigsman help Alex? Why didn't Dr. Krigsman's attention cure him? It would seem that Alex was "failed" by the biomed world just as much (if not more, considering the implied "cure") as the legitimate medical community. No doubt, though, this will be excused by claims that Dorothy could not afford it (such unscientific treatments are not, after all, covered by insurance) or some other such excuse.
At any rate, the CBS video segment paints a picture that is focused almost exclusively on how hard Dorothy Spourdalakis had it. As Scott Gavura notes over at Science-Based Pharmacy:
To me, the clips assembled by Attkisson paints a very sympathetic picture of the mother – focusing more on her “tireless struggles” and her claims that Alex’s medical needs went unaddressed and unheeded, so she could help him “recover”. The clip doesn’t even mention that the mother and the caregiver carefully planned the murder [link removed]Dr. Gavura goes on to note how the segment also fails to mention that Alex's case was taken up by the autism biomed movement as an example of the "harms" of vaccinations. In fact, the Autism Media Channel "documentary" was originally intended as a piece to showcase and drum up support for the sort of dangerous treatments I mentioned earlier. Now we have Polly Tommey and Andrew Wakefield (co-directors of the Autism Media Channel) shopping their footage around to capitalize on Alex's death.
Frankly, this ghoulish behavior is reprehensible, and that CBS would lend their name to it.
But the likes of Age of Autism (who, recall, excused Dorothy back in June) are quite happy with CBS. Again we see them excusing Alex's murderers and instead blaming the medical system that had tried to help and provide actual support for the family. In fact, Anne Dachel, the media editor for Age of Autism, made the following comment:
|Click to enlarge.|
And lest you think that one of those trying to profit off of this sordid story, Andrew Wakefield, is actually trying to help those with disabilities, here's an excerpt from his book, Callous Disregard:
Another north-easterly wind insinuated its futile energies between the massive brick piers of Hounds Ghyll viaduct. Although the wind endured, the earlier downpour had turned to a light drizzle - light for County Durham, in the far north of England - as their journey came to an end.Wakefield views autism as such a burden that, when it gets too hard, it isn't just acceptable to kill your child, it's merciful and loving. Committing murder-suicide is "keeping him safe".
As if for the first time, Mark seemed attuned to his mother's sense of purpose and he offered no resistance. He did not scream, or fight, or hit himself in the face; he did not bite his scarred and scabby arms or suddenly collapse to the ground as if invisible guy-ropes could no longer hold him. Instead, entranced by the raindrops and in awe of the viaduct's ordered brickwork, he mouthed in silent wonder at it all. At the midpoint of the viaduct she turned to the north, the deep valley before her - in places its walls sheer, glistening black, cut by relentless waters that were now barely visible in the fading light far, far below. Mark looked up into his mother's face; beyond its years, alone, harassed, pursued, and he understood her unhappiness. He loved her, although he had no way - no wiring - that allowed him to express this.
With the aid of some old timbers she helped him onto the parapet, her grip so firm that it hurt them both. This was the hardest part, the lichened stone wet and perilous, her fear of heights. Standing there at last, against the wind and against the world, he looked at her and she at him. "No," she thought, "this is the hardest part." Without a word, without another thought she stepped into oblivion, her most precious possession taken with her, to rank in death with Egyptian queens. They were not equal to the wind and in one final effort it gusted into them, threatening to smash the waif-like Mark into the merciless viaduct. She knew. She was ready. Falling ever faster, she pulled him to her, love and instinct keeping him safe.
CBS should be ashamed. They have lent their support to murderers, painting them in a sympathetic light. They have furthered the stigma that autism is to be feared. They have lent legitimacy to nonsensical pseudoscientific autism "treatments". They are betraying and insulting the memory of this wonderful child:
If you would like to write to CBS to complain and urge them to issue an apology and correction, you can contact them at:
CBS Chairman Jeffrey Fager
c/o CBS News
524 West 57th Street
New York, NY 10019
Others who have written about this:
Emily Willingham at Forbes - If A Parent Murders An Autistic Child, Who Is To Blame?
I Speak of Dreams - CBS's Sharyl Attkisson: This time, an apologist for murdering the disabled
Just the Vax - Sharyl Attkisson and CBS Dehumanise Autists for Ratings
Left Brain Right Brain - Whitewashing the brutal murder of Alex Spourdalakis
Mediaite - CBS News Should Retract Report Excusing Mother's Murder of Autistic Child
Respectful Insolence - Sharyl Attkisson and CBS News: Lying by omission about the murder of autistic teen Alex Spourdalakis
Science-Based Pharmacy - No, autism doesn’t justify murdering your child
Skeptical Raptor - Vaccine deniers think the murder of Alex Spourdalakis is acceptable
The Poxes Blog - It is now okay to kill your child
West by Autistic - CBS Provides Glimpse into "Documentary" Defending Autistic Teen Alex Spourdalakis' Killers